ISTANBUL: Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Secretary-General, World Kashmir Awareness Forum has said that the Kashmir conflict is often referred to as potentially the most dangerous dispute in the world, as it involves the fate of 1.5 billion people of South Asia which is one-fifth of the total human race.
Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai addressing the 5th International ASSAM Islamic Union Congress in Istanbul said, “Yet it is amazing that the world powers, with the United States as the sole super-power, maintain a largely leave-it-alone posture towards the (Kashmir) problem.
The conference was held with the participation of Üsküdar University (ÜÜ), Kütahya Dumlupınar University (KDU), Justice Defenders Association (ASDER), Union of NGOs of the Islamic World (UNIW) and Pakistan Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS), on ‘Determination of Principles and Procedures of Joint Foreign Policy for the Muslim world.’
Dr. Fai spoke on “The policy of the United States towards Kashmir.’
Dr. Fai elaborated that it was a historical fact that when the Kashmir dispute erupted in 1947-1948, the United States championed the stand that the future status of Kashmir must be ascertained in accordance with the wishes and aspirations of the people of the territory.
“The United States was the principal sponsor of Resolution # 47 which was adopted by the Security Council on 21 April 1948 and which was based on that unchallenged principle. Following the resolution, the United States as a leading member of the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP), adhered to that stand,” he added.
“Historically, the Kashmir dispute has been the most lasting victim of the cold war, during which the Soviet Union vetoed every resolution of the Security Council to implement the Council’s agreed-upon resolution. It is tragic that, even after the end of the cold war, the imbroglio has persisted, and the people of Kashmir have been subjected to grave abuses of their human rights. This is a fact that should weigh heavily on the international conscience. It should also be a challenge to international statesmanship,” Fai added.
He warned that an indication of the misplaced focus of the world powers including the United States is the wrong-headed talk about the “sanctity” of the Line of Control in Kashmir.
“It is forgotten that this line continues to exist only because of the international agreements which had been concluded between India and Pakistan, with the full support of the United States. This line was originally formalized by that agreement as a temporary cease-fire line pending the demilitarization of the State of Jammu and Kashmir and the holding of a plebiscite under impartial control to determine its future. To regard this line as a solution is to regard disease as a remedy. Any kind of agreement procured to that end, whether by the U.S. or under its influence, will not only not endure; it will invite resentment and revolt against whichever leadership in Kashmir will sponsor or subscribe to it,” he added.
Fai said that it was hard to understand why, contrary to its traditional
principled stand on the Kashmir dispute, the world powers have been in
recent years treating the problem as if it were an unchartered terrain
about which no road map exists. The United Nations has at its inception
devoted immense labor and thought, extending over a hundred meetings of
the Security Council with active U.S. participation, to its solution.
He urged the United States to ask the Secretary-General of the United Nations, with the concurrence of the Security Council, to engage himself, directly or through a representative of high international standing, in a sustained effort of mediation which should (a) ensure hat the positions of the people of Kashmir is fully taken into account and (b) aim at a settlement within a reasonable time-frame.
“In order to quicken and strengthen the peace process, United States would definitely recommend improving the atmosphere in Kashmir by revoking the Domicile Law, which is designed to change the demography of Kashmir, releasing of all political prisoners, a full restoration of civil liberties, including the liberty to express themselves peacefully on the question of their own future,” Fai concluded. TF Report